tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11101950.post417058162233897181..comments2023-11-02T15:31:22.535+00:00Comments on Michelle Styles:: Not Quite A Lady and the Philosophical SocietyMichelle Styleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03400990189443593076noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11101950.post-27014298207729054932007-05-24T07:11:00.000+01:002007-05-24T07:11:00.000+01:00You must not be sorry.It is the best sort of pulli...You must not be sorry.<BR/><BR/>It is the best sort of pulling out because it made me go and look up the Lit and Phil again. Note to self -- join again when next royality cheque arrives. I think it was also a case of being so pleased that anyone mentioned a Philosophical Society as far too often they are forgotten in historical romances but they were hugely Important.<BR/><BR/>I did enjoy NQAL very much.<BR/><BR/>Many thanks for stopping by.Michelle Styleshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03400990189443593076noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11101950.post-60190547593538883682007-05-24T01:28:00.000+01:002007-05-24T01:28:00.000+01:00Oh, dear, Michelle. Mea culpa. I am not quite su...Oh, dear, Michelle. Mea culpa. I am not quite sure how I went astray--brain damage? I was using the Philosophical Magazine as a reference and perhaps morphed that into the Philosophical Society? Or did I simply misread my notes? I know I had a reason for not using the Royal Society but can't remember what it was. So sorry. I try so hard not to bounce readers out of the story.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com